首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


How speakers interrupt themselves in managing problems in speaking: evidence from self-repairs
Authors:Seyfeddinipur Mandana  Kita Sotaro  Indefrey Peter
Institution:Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA; Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract:When speakers detect a problem in what they are saying, they must decide whether or not to interrupt themselves and repair the problem, and if so, when. Speakers will maximize accuracy if they interrupt themselves as soon as they detect a problem, but they will maximize fluency if they go on speaking until they are ready to produce the repair. Speakers must choose between these options. In a corpus analysis, we identified 448 speech repairs, classified them as major (as in a fresh start) or minor (as in a phoneme correction), and measured the interval between suspension and repair. The results showed that speakers interrupted themselves not at the moment they detected the problem but at the moment they were ready to produce the repair. Speakers preferred fluency over accuracy.
Keywords:Self-monitoring  Disfluency  Language production  Conversation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号