An assessment of the similarities between a measure of positive perfectionism and a measure of conscientious achievement striving |
| |
Authors: | Andrew P. Hill Howard K. HallPaul R. Appleton |
| |
Affiliation: | a Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, York St. John University, Lord Mayor’s Walk, York YO31 7EX, UK b School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesThe purpose of the study was to examine the similarities between the constructs measured by the positive perfectionism subscale from the Positive and Negative Perfectionism Scale and the achievement striving subscale from the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.DesignA non-experimental design was adopted.MethodOne-hundred and seventy-nine junior basketball players (age M = 16.50, s = 1.12) completed measures of positive perfectionism, conscientious achievement striving and other external measures.ResultsAnalyses revealed that the two scales were highly positively correlated and demonstrated a similar pattern of relationships with the external measures. However, a single latent factor model provided a comparatively poorer fit than a two latent factor model.ConclusionsThere is some evidence that the positive perfectionism and achievement striving constructs measured by the scales in this study are distinguishable as two distinct factors in a confirmatory factor analysis; however, more empirical evidence is needed to establish their substantive differences. |
| |
Keywords: | Motivation Achievement Jingle-jangle Construct validity |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|