The appraisal basis of anger: specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components |
| |
Authors: | Kuppens Peter Van Mechelen Iven Smits Dirk J M De Boeck Paul |
| |
Affiliation: | University of Leuven, Department of Psychology, Leuven, Belgium. peter.kuppens@psy.kuleuven.ac.be |
| |
Abstract: | The nature of the association between anger and 5 appraisal-action tendency components--goal obstacle, other accountability, unfairness, control, and antagonism--was examined in terms of specificity, necessity, and sufficiency. In 2 studies, participants described recently experienced unpleasant situations in which 1 of the appraisal-action tendency components was present or absent and indicated which emotions they had experienced. The results showed that (a) other accountability and arrogant entitlement, as an instance of unfairness, are specific appraisals ability for anger; and most important, (b) none of the components is necessary or sufficient for anger. The findings suggest that the relation between emotions and appraisal-action tendency components should be conceptualized instead as a contingent association, meaning that they usually co-occur. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|