A kinky doctrine of sin |
| |
Authors: | J. D. R. Mechelke |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Theological and Philosophical Studies in Religion, Drew University, Madison, NJ, USAjmechelke@drew.eduhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-2920 |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACTReligious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice “kinky sex.” These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices. |
| |
Keywords: | Queer theology sin kinky BDSM S/M sexual ethics discourse Gustavo Gutiérrez Mary Elise Lowe Jeremy Carrette Gayle S. Rubin Robert Goss Judith Butler Michel Foucault |
|
|