Learning from examples does not prevent order effects in belief revision |
| |
Authors: | Martin R. K. Baumann Josef F. Krems Frank E. Ritter |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. German Aerospace Centre DLR , Braunschweig, Germany martin.baumann@dlr.de;3. Chemnitz University of Technology , Chemnitz, Germany;4. The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | A common finding is that information order influences belief revision (e.g., Hogarth & Einhorn, 1992 Hogarth, R. M. and Einhorn, H. J. 1992. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24: 1–55. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). We tested personal experience as a possible mitigator. In three experiments participants experienced the probabilistic relationship between pieces of information and object category through a series of trials where they assigned objects (planes) into one of two possible categories (hostile or commercial), given two sequentially presented pieces of probabilistic information (route and ID), and then they had to indicate their belief about the object category before feedback. The results generally confirm the predictions from the Hogarth and Einhorn model. Participants showed a recency effect in their belief revision. Extending previous model evaluations the results indicate that the model predictions also hold for classification decisions, and for pieces of information that vary in their diagnostic values. Personal experience does not appear to prevent order effects in classification decisions based on sequentially presented pieces of information and in belief revision. |
| |
Keywords: | Belief revision Opinion revision Order effects Learning from examples Probability learning |
|
|