No templates for rejection: a failure to configure attention to ignore task-irrelevant features |
| |
Authors: | Mark W. Becker Samuel Hemsteger Chad Peltier |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USAbecker54@msu.edu;3. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACTKnowing the colour of an upcoming target allows one to bias attention towards objects of that colour. It is far less clear whether knowing the colour of an up-coming distractor can allow one to suppress attention to items of that colour. Arita, Carlisle, and Woodman (2012) suggest that people can create a template for rejection. However, the method used in Arita et al. may have allowed people to adopt a strategy of internally generating a positive cue for the target colour or target hemifield. Here we use a method very similar to theirs, but manipulate the display layouts and the number of un-cued colours in ways that should thwart such strategies. Across three experiments, we find a negative cuing benefit only in a very special circumstance that encourages a strategic shift to internally generating a positive cue (the same circumstance used by Arita et al.). We conclude that people are unable to use a negative feature-cue on a trial-by-trial basis to suppress attention to upcoming distractors, and attribute the finding in Arita et al. to a strategic shift rather than a template for rejection. |
| |
Keywords: | Visual attention feature-based attention suppression of attention cuing distractors top-down attentional control attention control settings |
|
|