Conditional reasoning in context: A developmental dual processes account |
| |
Authors: | Caroline Gauffroy Pierre Barrouillet |
| |
Institution: | 1. Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Education, Université de Genève, SwitzerlandCaroline.Gauffroy@unige.ch;3. Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Education, Université de Genève, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | The way individuals interpret “if p then q” conditionals varies with content and context, often resulting in a biconditional reading. Surprisingly, truth table tasks reveal the existence of two different types of biconditional interpretations: equivalence, as for promises and threats, and defective biconditional, as for causal conditionals or indicative conditionals involving binary terms. The aim of this study was to determine how the interpretation of indicative conditionals is affected in children, adolescents, and adults, by restricting their context of enunciation to only one possible alternative for both the antecedent and the consequent. Moreover, we wanted to determine what is the exact nature of the biconditional interpretation induced by these restricted contexts. For this purpose, third, sixth, and ninth graders and adults performed a truth-value task on indicative conditionals presented either in restricted on non-restricted contexts. Restricted contexts had no effect on children who have a conjunctive interpretation of the conditional, but elicited a predominant defective biconditional reading in adolescents and adults. These results corroborate the developmental dual process account of conditional reasoning proposed by Gauffroy and Barrouillet (2009). |
| |
Keywords: | Conditional reasoning Mental models Heuristic and analytic processes Context effect |
|
|