Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, UK;2. Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, The Netherlands;3. Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy;1. Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Trust, UK;2. University of Liverpool, UK;3. University of Chester, UK;4. John Moores University Liverpool, UK;5. Health Education England North West, Liverpool, UK;1. University of Melbourne, Australia;2. Swinburne University of Technology, Australia;3. Deakin University, Australia;4. School of Psychology, University of Queensland |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper, I argue that every rehabilitation program presupposes conceptions of possible good lives for offenders and, associated with this, an understanding of the necessary internal and external conditions for living such lives. I first clarify the notion of good lives and outline its necessary features. Second, I establish the conclusion that all offender programs presuppose a conception of good lives. In order to make the argument a little more concrete, I demonstrate how a state-of-the-art treatment program for sex offenders and research on the process of offender change presuppose such a conception and expose the problems evident in the way they engage with this dimension of rehabilitation. Third, I argue that it is necessary for individuals working to rehabilitate offenders to explicitly construct conceptions of good lives for different offenders and to use these conceptions to shape the behavior change process. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
