Humanitarian intervention and historical responsibility |
| |
Authors: | Fredrik D. Hjorthen Göran Duus-Otterström |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | Some suggest that the duty of humanitarian intervention should be discharged by states that are historically responsible for the occurrence of violence. A fundamental problem with this suggestion is that historically responsible states might be ill-suited to intervene because they are unlikely to enjoy support from the local population. Cécile Fabre has suggested a way around that problem, arguing that responsible states ought to pay for humanitarian interventions even though they ought not to take part in the military operations. We claim that Fabre’s idea is subject to two concerns. First, the duty to perform might not be appropriately transferrable from the historically responsible state to another state because it would allow the primary duty bearer to escape the worst costs of intervention. Second, an intervention might be as unlikely to generate local support when a historically responsible state pays for an intervention as when it performs it. These problems are enough to cast doubt on Fabre’s idea. However, the idea is helpful because it highlights as yet neglected questions about how the financial and material burden of humanitarian intervention is to be shared. |
| |
Keywords: | Duty to intervene international justice historical responsibility humanitarian intervention Responsibility to Protect |
|
|