首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Distinguishing intellectual humility and general humility
Authors:Don E. Davis  Kenneth Rice  Stacey McElroy  Cirleen DeBlaere  Elise Choe  Daryl R. Van Tongeren
Affiliation:1. Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA;2. Department of Psychology, Hope College, Holland, MI, USA
Abstract:Two studies provide evidence for distinguishing intellectual humility (IH) from general humility (GH). Humility involves (a) an Accurate View of Self and (b) the ability to regulate egotism and cultivate an other-oriented stance; IH is a subdomain of humility that involves (a) having an accurate view of one’s intellectual strengths and limitations and (b) the ability to negotiate ideas in a fair and inoffensive manner. First, we present a theoretical framework for distinguishing these constructs. In Study 1, with a sample of undergraduate students (N = 1097), we used confirmatory factor analysis to provide empirical evidence for this distinction. We also found that IH predicted unique variance in openness to experience relative to GH. In Study 2, we examined additional evidence of discriminant validity with another sample of college students (N = 355). IH also predicted unique variance in need for cognition, objectivism, and religious ethnocentrism relative to GH.
Keywords:humility  measurement  intellectual humility
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号