|
|||||
|
|
EXPLANATIONIST REBUTTALS (COHERENTISM DEFENDED AGAIN) |
|
| Authors: | WILLIAM G LYCAN |
| Abstract: | An explanatory coherence theory of justification is sketched and then defended against a number of recent objections: conservatism and relativism; wild and crazy beliefs; reliability; warranted necessary falsehoods; basing; distant, unknown coherences; Sosa's “self‐ and present‐abstracts”; and Bayesian impossibility results. |
| Keywords: | |