(1) University of Leiden, Opleiding Nederlandse Taal en Cultuur, Postbus 9515, 2300, RA, Leiden, The Netherlands
Abstract:
Summary This contribution offers an evaluation of e contrario reasoning in which the interpretation of a legal rule is based on the
context of the law system (contextual e contrario reasoning). A model is presented which will show all the explicit and implicit
elements of the argument at work and will also point out how these distinct parts are interrelated. By questioning the content
and justificatory power of these elements, the weak spots in the argument can be laid bare. It will be argued that e contrario
reasoning inevitably requires a dubious argumentative step, which renders the argument intrinsically weak. The model is applied
to a European lawsuit on French cheese.