Economically organized hierarchies in WordNet and the Oxford English Dictionary |
| |
Authors: | Mark A. Changizi |
| |
Affiliation: | aDepartment of Cognitive Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Good definitions consist of words that are more basic than the defined word. There are, however, many ways of satisfying this desideratum. For example, at one extreme, there could be a small set of atomic words that are used to define all other words; i.e., there would be just two hierarchical levels. Alternatively, there could be many hierarchical levels, where a small set of atomic words is used to define a larger set of words, and these are, in turn, used to define the next hierarchically higher set of words, and so on to the top-level of very specific, complex words. Importantly, some possible organizations are more economical than others in the amount of space required to record all the definitions. Here I ask, How economical are dictionaries? I present a simple model for an optimal set of definitions, predicting on the order of seven hierarchical levels. I test the model via measurements from WordNet and the Oxford English Dictionary, and find that the organization of each possesses the signature features expected for an economical dictionary. |
| |
Keywords: | Vocabulary Hierarchy Optimality WordNet Definition Dictionary Number of levels |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|