首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Interviewing to detect omission lies
Authors:Sharon Leal  Aldert Vrij  Haneen Deeb  Ronald P Fisher
Institution:1. Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK;2. Department of Psychology, Florida International University, North Miami, Florida, USA
Abstract:Interviewees sometimes deliberately omit reporting some information. Such omission lies differ from other lies because all the information interviewees present may be entirely truthful. Truth tellers and lie tellers carried out a mission. Truth tellers reported the entire mission truthfully. Lie tellers were also entirely truthful but left out one element of the mission. In truth tellers' statements, only the parts that lie tellers were also asked to recall were analysed. Interviews were carried out via the Cognitive Credibility Assessment, Reality Interview, or standard interview protocol. Dependent variables were the details, complications and verifiable sources interviewees reported. A questionnaire measured three deception strategies: ‘Tell it all’, ‘keep it simple’ or ‘paying attention to demeanour’. Lie tellers reported fewer details, complications and verifiable sources than truth tellers and reporting these variables was negatively correlated with the ‘keep it simple’ and ‘demeanour’ strategies. The type of interview protocol did not affect the results.
Keywords:cognitive credibility assessment  complications  deception  lying through omissions  reality interviewing
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号