Ethics and Imagination |
| |
Authors: | Nordgren Anders |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Social Medicine, Akademiska Sjukhuset, S – 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | Cognitive semantics has made important empirical findings about human conceptualization. In this paper some findings concerning moral concepts are analyzed and their implications for medical ethics discussed. The key idea is that morality has to do with metaphors and imagination rather than with well-defined concepts and deduction. It is argued that normative medical ethics to be psychologically realistic should take these findings seriously. This means that an imaginative casuistry is to be preferred compared to principlism and to other forms of casuistry. Furthermore, the metaphorical character of central principles in medical ethics such as autonomy, utility, justice, and integrity is indicated. Such principles are interpreted as rules of thumb summarizing the collective wisdom concerning prototype cases. |
| |
Keywords: | casuistry cognitive semantics ethical principles medical ethics metaphors moral concepts imagination Mark Johnson prototype theory |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|