Self-consciousness,role discrepancy,and depressive affect |
| |
Authors: | Jay G. Hull Nora P. Reilly Louis C. Ennis |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Dartmouth College, Washington State University, Dartmouth College;2. Department of Psychology , Dartmouth College , Hanover, NH, 03755, USA;3. Dartmouth College, Washington State University, Dartmouth College |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that depressive affect is a joint function of private self-consciousness and the extent to which an individual's self-concept is discrepant from the requirements of a significant role. In the first study, the role of college student was empirically defined using a technique developed by Burke and Tully (1977). As predicted, the discrepancy between this role definition and subjects' self-ratings was a more significant predictor of depressive affect among high than low private self-conscious individuals. In the second study, measurements were taken at two time periods that were spaced six weeks apart. In a replication of the results of Study 1, the discrepancy between the role definition and subjects' self-ratings was a more significant predictor of depressive affect at Time 1 among high than low self-conscious individuals. In addition, discrepancy at Time 1 was a significant predictor of depression at Time 2 among high but not low self-conscious individuals. On the other hand, depression at Time 1 was unrelated to discrepancy at Time 2 among high self-conscious subjects. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that high private self-consciousness combined with role-identity discrepancy is associated with increased risk of depression. Finally, additional analyses suggested that depression may itself function to increase subsequent self-consciousness. |
| |
Keywords: | Role-discrepancy self-consciousness depression |
|
|