For richer,for poorer: Financial behaviors,power (im)balance,and relational aggression among different-gender newlyweds in the U.S. |
| |
Authors: | Xiaomin Li Brandan E. Wheeler Spencer L. James Ashley B. LeBaron-Black Erin K. Holmes Jeremy B. Yorgason |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR;2. Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Alabama A&M University, Normal, Alabama, USA;3. School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Guided by an intersectional feminism framework, we used three-wave, dyadic survey data from a nationally representative sample of 1625 U.S. different-gender newlywed couples to test three research questions. First, as balanced power is considered a key concept for relational well-being in feminism, we examined developmental trajectories in husbands' and wives' perception of power (im)balance. Second, considering money as a major influence on power and aggression, we examined how financial behaviors relate to power (im)balance and in turn relational aggression—a type of intimate partner violence that is controlling and manipulative in nature. Third, informed by the intersectionality between gender and socioeconomic status (SES), we examined gender differences and SES disparities in the associations among financial behaviors, developmental trajectories of perception of power (im)balance, and relational aggression. Our findings demonstrate that newlywed different-gender couples are experiencing power struggles, where two partners diminish each other's influence over time. We also found that healthy financial behaviors are associated with balanced power and, in turn, less relational aggression (especially for wives and in lower-SES households). Taken collectively, we continue calling for efforts to facilitate money management skills and promote balanced marital power. |
| |
Keywords: | feminism financial behaviors intersectionality power (im)balance relational aggression socioeconomic status |
|
|