Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view

In this study, pigeons learned 2 separate one-to-many conditional discriminations in which they matched form samples to line and hue comparisons. Correct choices within each comparison dimension yielded differential (food vs. no-food) outcomes that were not predictable from the samples alone. At asymptote, latency to make a correct choice was shorter when food was the contingent outcome than when no food was the outcome. More important, when the samples from each task were subsequently exchanged, comparison choice varied systematically as a function of the sample and the set of new comparison alternatives that followed them. Together, these results indicate that choices were cued by differential outcome expectancies arising from serial compounds consisting of each sample and the dimensional characteristics of the comparisons.