Questioning the Presumption of Naturalism in the Social Sciences: A Case Study |
| |
Authors: | Brent D. Slife Shannon Starks Mark Primosch |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Clinical Psychology, Brigham Young University, 1072 SWKT, Provo, UT, 84602, USA 2. Social Psychology, Brigham Young University, 1072 SWKT, Provo, UT, 84602, USA 3. Psychology, Brigham Young University, 1072 SWKT, Provo, UT, 84602, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | An important consensus has occurred across the social sciences: The best philosophy for guiding knowledge advancement omits any substantive reference to an active transcendent being. This philosophy of naturalism is so prevalent that social science disciplines renowned for examining research philosophies, such as anthropology, overlook naturalism. This article describes an anthropological case in point: E. E. Evans-Pritchard’s study of the Azande people. Evans-Pritchard is noted for his thoughtful and thorough cultural studies, and the Azande are noted for their unorthodox, non-naturalistic beliefs. We describe the interaction of this anthropologist and culture and find that he presumes a reified naturalism, which dramatically affects his understanding and treatment of this non-naturalistic culture. We then proffer several lessons and implications for pastoral psychology and psychotherapy that follow from our case study. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|