首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Measuring any conscious content versus measuring the relevant conscious content: Comment on Sandberg et al.
Authors:Zoltan Dienes  Anil K Seth
Institution:a Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, Sussex, UK;b Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK
Abstract:Sandberg et al. show that the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) scale is sensitive compared to confidence ratings and wagering in detecting accurate perception. They go on to argue that the PAS scale is hence a sensitive measure of conscious perception compared to confidence ratings, a claim disputed here. The fact that some visual content is conscious does not entail that the visual content relevant to making a discrimination is conscious. For example, if one saw a square but was only aware of seeing a flash of something, then one has not consciously seen a square. When PAS and confidence ratings come in conflict, we suggest that it is confidence ratings that more reliably indicate the conscious status of contents allowing discrimination.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号