首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception
Authors:Jacob De Rosa  Cheryl Hiscock‐Anisman  Adam Blythe  Glynis Bogaard  Ashley Hally  Kevin Colwell
Abstract:This study compared the Stepwise Interview, Cognitive Interview, and Reality Interview in detecting deception with inmates. The dependent measures were the amount of unique details provided during the free narrative and mnemonics and the number of words provided during the free narrative and mnemonics of each interview. The Stepwise Interview generated 58.3% accuracy, the Cognitive Interview generated 70.0% accuracy, and the Reality Interview generated 93.3% accuracy. The different tasks of these interviews increased the differences between honest and deceptive statements and therefore, increased the accuracy in detection of deception. Differential recall enhancement is used to explain the findings.
Keywords:credibility assessment  detecting deception  investigative interviewing
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号