The effect of gender-schematic processing on decisions about sex-inappropriate sport behavior

This research investigates the effect of gender-schematic processing on decisions to reject sex-inappropriate sports. Sex-typed subjects expressly state concerns about the gender appropriateness of the sport more often than androgynous and undifferentiated subjects. Moreover, they rate gender-based factors as more important to their decisions than the latter two groups. Second, we assess whether gender-schematic processing of the self extends to gender-schematic processing of others. When told only that a fictitious person enjoys doing either a masculine or feminine sport, sex-typed subjects are more likely to draw sex-consistent conclusions about that person than are androgynous and undifferentiated subjects. A discussion of cross-sex-typed subjects' responses is included and it is suggested that considering males' responses separately from females' may be more informative for certain experimental tasks.This article is based upon a doctoral dissertation submitted to the Department of Psychology, Cornell University, 1984. The author wishes to thank Sandra L. Bem, Daryl Bem, and Thomas Gilovich for guidance throughout this work. Gordon H. Bower, Leonard M. Horowitz, Margaret Intons-Peterson, and an anonymous reviewer deserve thanks for their extended comments and discussions of this work. Thanks are also due to Ann Wycoff and Paula Christianson who served as experimenters, to James P. Cunningham for statistical assistance, and James P. Fallon for computer programming assistance. This research was supported by the Department of Psychology, Cornell University.