首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3): A Comparison Between 561 Female Eating Disorders Patients and 878 Females from the General Population
Authors:Loa?Clausen  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:loaclaus@rm.dk"   title="  loaclaus@rm.dk"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Jan?H.?Rosenvinge,Oddgeir?Friborg,Kristian?Rokkedal
Affiliation:1.Eating Disorders Centre, Regional Centre of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,University Hospital of Aarhus,Risskov,Denmark;2.Department of Psychology,University of Troms?,Troms?,Norway;3.Psychiatric Research Centre of Northern Norway,University Hospital of Northern Norway,Troms?,Norway
Abstract:The Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) is used worldwide in research and clinical work. The 3rd version (EDI-3) has been used in recent research, yet without any independent testing of its psychometric properties. The aim of the present study was twofold: 1) to establish national norms and to compare them with the US and international norms, and 2) to examine the factor structure, the internal consistency, the sensitivity and the specificity of subscale scores. Participants were Danish adult female patients (N = 561) from a specialist treatment centre and a control group (N = 878) was women selected from the Danish Civil Registration system. Small but significant differences were found between Danish and international, as well as US norms. Overall, the factor structure was confirmed, the internal consistency of the subscales was satisfactory, the discriminative validity was good, and sensitivity and specificity were excellent. The implications from these results are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号