The effects of interpersonal relationship and character gender on adolescents' resolutions of moral dilemmas |
| |
Authors: | Ann V McGillicuddy-De Lisi Brigid Sullivan Mary beth Hughes |
| |
Institution: | Psychology Department, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA |
| |
Abstract: | An experimental study using two forms of the Defining Issues Test Rest, J. R. (1979). Revised manual for the Defining Issues Test. Minneapolis: Moral Research Project, University of Minnesota.], modified to present either a high degree of relationship among characters or a low degree of relationship among characters, was conducted with 114 college students. The gender of the characters in the dilemmas was also systematically varied. Both male and female students evidenced principled (Stages 5 and 6) reasoning more often when dilemma characters were male than when story characters were female. Participant gender and relationship condition were significant factors in the frequency of Stage 4 reasoning. Male students in the low-relationship condition evidenced Stage 4 (“Law and order”) reasoning most often when story characters were male, while male students, like female students in all conditions, showed Stage 4 reasoning more often when female characters were presented in the high-relationship condition. The degree to which moral decisions were supportive of an affected character revealed more support when story characters were female than when they were male. Results indicate that even in hypothetical situations, moral judgments vary with the gender of the person being judged and to some degree with the relationships among those involved in the dilemma. These findings are consistent with a view that multiple, equally valid approaches to moral judgment might exist and affect the development of male and female students differently. |
| |
Keywords: | Moral reasoning Relationships Gender differences Hypothetical dilemmas |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|