A consideration of challenges to psychological assessment instruments used in forensic settings: Rorschach as exemplar |
| |
Authors: | Hilsenroth Mark J Stricker George |
| |
Affiliation: | The Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA. hilsenro@adelphi.edu |
| |
Abstract: | In this brief primer, we provide an outline of key issues that will help psychologists organize and prepare their expert testimony. These issues include the need to obtain essential sources of research, a review of the actual legal standards regarding admissibility of test data in expert testimony, the nature of the expert relative to the assessment instrument in expert testimony, the nature of legal versus scientific debate, and the examination of appropriate qualifications of expertise when offering legal testimony. In addition, we use a summary of information contained in several recent articles to address challenges directed against forensic psychological testing. We use the empirical literature on the Rorschach as an exemplar in discussing these issues, as the admissibility of the Rorschach in particular has been challenged, and the issues frequently focused on with the Rorschach are equally applicable to other psychological measures. In this article, we provide essential sources of Rorschach research regarding several empirical studies that summarize important information and directly address previous criticisms of the measure. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|