Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness |
| |
| Authors: | Morten Overgaard Bert Timmermans Kristian Sandberg Axel Cleeremans |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Center, Voldbyvej 15, 8450 Hammel, Denmark;2. Consciousness, Cognition & Computation Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium;1. Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, Building 10G, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;2. UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, WC1N 3AR London, United Kingdom;3. Department of Biostatistics, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Building 1261, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;4. Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Dept. of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Kroghstræde 3, 9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark;1. Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, United States;2. Neuroscience Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, United States;3. Department of Bioengineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States;1. Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA;2. Programs in Psychology and Biology, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA;3. Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA;1. Consciousness Lab, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland;2. SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Katowice Faculty of Psychology, Katowice, Poland;3. School of Psychology, King''s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom;1. Consciousness Lab, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland;2. Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus C, Denmark |
| |
| Abstract: | Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure.Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
