首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The Validation of a Five-Item Screening Scale for Personality Disorders in Dutch-Speaking Community Adolescents and Adults
Authors:Eggermont  Kristina  Luyckx  Koen  Smits  Dirk  Bogaerts  Annabel  Buelens  Tinne  Bastiaens  Tim  Claes  Laurence
Institution:1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, box 3717, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
;2.UNIBS, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
;3.Research Department, Odisee University of Applied Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
;4.Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
;5.University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium
;6.Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (CAPRI), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
;
Abstract:

In Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – fifth edition (DSM-5), an Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) is proposed, including a criterion for personality functioning impairment (Criterion A) to assess severity of personality pathology. The present study examined the structure, reliability, and convergent validity of the Dutch version of a five-item screening scale for Criterion A—the Five-Item Screening Scale for Personality Disorders (FISSPD; Skodol et al., in Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 4-22, 2011)—in a community sample of 1,477 adolescents and 546 adults. To assess convergent validity, identity and personality (pathology) questionnaires were completed by adolescents and adults. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a single factor structure for the FISSPD, which proved to be (partially) invariant across age and gender. Adequate reliability coefficients were obtained for the FISSPD. In both the adolescent and adult sample, significant correlations were found between the FISSPD and consolidated identity (negative) and disturbed identity/lack of identity (positive). In the adult sample, the FISSPD showed significant correlations with several personality disorders (and especially with the borderline personality disorder), maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B of the AMPD), and general personality impairment. In the adolescent sample, the FISSPD was positively correlated with borderline personality disorder characteristics. Furthermore, significant correlations were found with the Big-Five personality traits in the adolescent sample: the FISSPD correlated significantly positive with neuroticism, and negative with extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. In sum, the present study supports the reliability and validity of the FISSPD to screen for (severity of) personality pathology.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号