Repeating the target neither speeds nor slows its detection: Evidence for independent channels in letter processing

A target letter at a predesignated location typically is identified less readily when extraneous letters are added to the display. This disruption has been attributed to lateral interference via interactive or inhibitory channels or to attempts to encode the string as a unit. In the present study, subjects saw a single letter (e.g., B), a repeated-letter string (e.g., BBBB), or an extraneous-letters string (e.g., BCLD) and had to decide whether the leftmost letter in the string matched a target letter. Since trials were blocked by string type, letter position did not have to be discriminated on repeated-letter trials, nor was response competition present on those trials. With normal letter spacing, RT was virtually the same on repeated-letter trials as on single-letter trials. (Increasing the letter spacing in Experiment 3 did produce a slight, but nonsignificant, 22-msec increment on the repeated-letter trials.) The results indicate that individual letters are perceived as such just as well when presented in a group as when presented individually and thus provide support for the parallel, independent-channels model.