首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Efficacy of Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapies for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in Older Adults: Working Toward a Theoretical Model and Evidence-Based Interventions
Authors:Marilyn Huckans  Lee Hutson  Elizabeth Twamley  Amy Jak  Jeffrey Kaye  Daniel Storzbach
Affiliation:1. Research & Development Service, Portland VA Medical Center, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
11. Portland VA Medical Center (MHN), 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
2. Behavioral Health and Clinical Neurosciences Division, Portland VA Medical Center, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
3. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
4. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., San Diego, CA, 92093, USA
5. Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., San Diego, CA, 92093, USA
6. Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, 92161, USA
7. Department of Psychology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, 92161, USA
10. Oregon Center for Aging and Technology (ORATECH), Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
8. Department of Neurology, Portland VA Medical Center, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
9. Layton Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
Abstract:To evaluate the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation therapies (CRTs) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Our review revealed a need for evidence-based treatments for MCI and a lack of a theoretical rehabilitation model to guide the development and evaluation of these interventions. We have thus proposed a theoretical rehabilitation model of MCI that yields key intervention targets–cognitive compromise, functional compromise, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and modifiable risk and protective factors known to be associated with MCI and dementia. Our model additionally defines specific cognitive rehabilitation approaches that may directly or indirectly target key outcomes–restorative cognitive training, compensatory cognitive training, lifestyle interventions, and psychotherapeutic techniques. Fourteen randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Studies markedly varied in terms of intervention approaches and selected outcome measures and were frequently hampered by design limitations. The bulk of the evidence suggested that CRTs can change targeted behaviors in individuals with MCI and that CRTs are associated with improvements in objective cognitive performance, but the pattern of effects on specific cognitive domains was inconsistent across studies. Other important outcomes (i.e., daily functioning, quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptom severity) were infrequently assessed across studies. Few studies evaluated long-term outcomes or the impact of CRTs on conversion rates from MCI to dementia or normal cognition. Overall, results from trials are promising but inconclusive. Additional well-designed and adequately powered trials are warranted and required before CRTs for MCI can be considered evidence-based.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号