首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The need for developing standardized family pedigree nomenclature
Authors:R. L. Bennett MS  K. A. Steinhaus  S. B. Uhrich  C. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:(1) Division of Medical Genetics, UWMC, Seattle, Washington;(2) Division of Human Genetics, UC, Irvine, California;(3) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UWMC, Seattle, Washington;(4) Medical Genetics, RG-25, UWMC, 1959 NE Pacific Street, 98195 Seattle, Washington
Abstract:To assess the variation in usage of symbols used in recording a genetic family history, full members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors were surveyed by questionnaire. The questionnaire return rate was 55.3% and genetic counselors from a broad range of clinical experience, genetic counseling training programs and geographic regions responded. There was striking variation in symbols used for recording routine medical information in a genetic family history (i.e., pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, termination of pregnancy). There was even less consensus in recording situations representing new reproductive technologies (i.e., artificial insemination by donor semen, donor ovum, surrogate motherhood). The results of this survey document the need for developing standardized nomenclature in recording genetic family histories as a quality assurance measure in the delivery of genetic services. Such standardization will reduce the chance of incorrect interpretation of patient and family medical and genetic information.
Keywords:family history  genetic counseling  pedigree  quality assurance  reproductive  technology
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号