Linking dimensions and dynamics in psychopathology research: An example using DSM-5 instruments |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Penn State Altoona, Department of Psychology, United States;2. The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Psychology, United States;1. Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark;2. Center on Autobiographical Memory Research (CON AMORE), Aarhus University, Denmark;1. University at Albany, State University of New York, United States;2. University of Connecticut, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | The DSM-5 includes two measures to assess dimensions of personality pathology (Personality Inventory for DSM-5; PID-5) and cross-cutting symptoms of psychopathology (DSM-5 Cross-cutting Symptom Measure; CCS). Few studies have evaluated these measures in an ecologically valid context. Participants (N = 248, student sample) completed self-report versions of the DSM-5 measures, and then completed a two-week daily diary of internalizing and externalizing outcomes. The CCS scales evidenced convergent and discriminant validity with these outcomes, PID-5 Negative Affectivity and Detachment were related to internalizing outcomes, and PID-5 Antagonism was related to externalizing outcomes. We also demonstrated the benefit of linking static dimensions to temporally-dynamic processes by examining how PID-5/CCS dimensions moderated the within-person associations among daily cognitive distortions and internalizing and externalizing outcomes. |
| |
| Keywords: | Experience sampling methodology Multilevel modeling Personality inventory for DSM-5 DSM-5 level 1 cross cutting symptom measure Structure of psychopathology |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
