Validity of evaluative factors from Big Five and HEXACO questionnaires |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands;2. Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark;1. Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, 145 Jean-Jacques-Lussier, Ottawa, Ontario K1N6N5, Canada;2. Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B6A9, Canada;3. Department of Psychology, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S3A1, Canada;4. Department of Psychology, Nipissing University, 100 College Drive, North Bay, Ontario P1B8L7, Canada;1. Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada;2. University of Calgary, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | Bifactor models were applied to the NEO-FFI-3, HEXACO PI-R, and BFI-2 questionnaires. Factor scores of factors representing the domains of the questionnaires, evaluation, and acquiescence were estimated. Simple and multiple validities of the factor scores were compared with summated scale validities. The evaluation factor was a significant predictor of GPA in all questionnaires. There was little evidence of a relation of GPA to the acquiescence factor. The validities of the domain factor scores, controlling for the evaluation and acquiescence factors, were uniformly more negative than those of corresponding summated scales. Results suggest that the evaluative contamination of Big Five and HEXACO summated scores can be isolated and used effectively with bifactor modeling techniques. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
