Effort,aversive representations and performance in test anxiety

The effects that effort and attention to aversive representations have on performance are analysed. Effort is manipulated by monetary incentives, and aversive representations are provoked by test and failure conditions. The most difficult items of the task—an inductive non-verbal reasoning test—are performed more poorly by high-trait-anxious Ss under test conditions with reward than by low-anxious Ss, but they do not differ under test instructions without reward. And there are no differences in the less difficult items. These results lend support to Eysenck's conceptualization on the effects of anxiety on performance effectiveness and on processing efficiency. Alternative interpretations are discussed.