Subjective shortening in humans' memory for stimulus duration

Three experiments investigated memory for stimulus duration in humans using a modification of a delayed-matching technique previously used to study event memory in pigeons. In a session of 48 discrete trials subjects were presented with a sample stimulus (a 500-Hz tone with mean duration of 400 msec) then a comparison stimulus (the same duration as the sample, or longer or shorter), after a delay that was 1 to 10 sec in Experiments 1 and 2, and 2 to 16 sec in Experiment 3. After the comparison had been presented, subjects judged whether the sample and comparison had the same duration (a YES/NO decision, Experiment 1), or whether the comparison was longer, shorter, or of the same duration as the sample (Experiments 2 and 3). Overall, mean number of correct responses changed little with increases in the delay, but the change of number of correct responses with delay was markedly different on trials in which the sample and comparison were the same, the comparison was shorter, or the comparison was longer. In general, accuracy declined with increasing delay in the first case, remained constant in the second case, and increased when the comparison was longer than the sample. Examination of the types of errors made on the different sorts of trials (Experiment 3) suggested that the data were produced by two mechanisms: (1) subjective shortening of the sample as the delay between sample and comparison increased, and (2) a time-order error to respond that the sample was longer than the comparison. Overall, it appears that humans' working memory for duration exhibits a subjective shortening effect similar to that previously found in pigeons.