Phonological complexity in school-aged children who stutter and exhibit a language disorder |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Southern Connecticut State University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 501 Crescent St, New Haven, CT 06515, United States;2. Communicative Disorders, University of Redlands, 1200 E Colton Ave., Redlands, CA 92373, United States;1. Institute for Stuttering Treatment & Research (ISTAR), Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada;2. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada;1. Speech Pathology and Audiology, Kent State University, United States;2. Evaluation and Measurement, Kent State University, United States;1. Evaluation and Measurement, Kent State University, United States;2. Speech Pathology and Audiology, Kent State University, United States;1. Biomedical Engineering Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran;2. Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran |
| |
| Abstract: | PurposeThe Index of Phonological Complexity and the Word Complexity Measure are two measures of the phonological complexity of a word. Other phonological measures such as phonological neighborhood density have been used to compare stuttered versus fluent words. It appears that in preschoolers who stutter, the length and complexity of the utterance is more influential than the phonetic features of the stuttered word. The present hypothesis was that in school-age children who stutter, stuttered words would be more phonologically complex than fluent words, when the length and complexity of the utterance containing them is comparable. School-age speakers who stutter were hypothesized to differ from those with a concomitant language disorder.MethodsSixteen speakers, six females and ten males (M age = 12;3; Range = 7;7 to 19;5) available from an online database, were divided into eight who had a concomitant language disorder (S + LD) and eight age- and sex-matched speakers who did not (S-Only).ResultsWhen all stuttered content words were identified, S + LD speakers produced more repetitions, and S-Only speakers produced more inaudible sound prolongations. When stuttered content words were matched to fluent content words and when talker groups were combined, stuttered words were significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher in both the Index of Phonological Complexity and the Word Complexity Measure and lower in density (“sparser”) than fluent words.ConclusionsResults corroborate those of previous researchers. Future research directions are suggested, such as cross-sectional designs to evaluate developmental patterns of phonological complexity and stuttering plus language disordered connections.Educational objectives: The reader will be able to: (a) Define and describe phonological complexity; (b) Define phonological neighborhood density and summarize the literature on the topic; (c) Describe the Index of Phonological Complexity (IPC) for a given word; (d) Describe the Word Complexity Measure (WCM) for a given word; (e) Summarize two findings from the current study and describe how each relates to studies of phonological complexity and fluency disorders. |
| |
| Keywords: | Key terms: Stuttering Phonological complexity Language disorders Concomitant disorders |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
