The role of variety in the evolution of information society

Information is power. There are several theoretical considerations which guide the basic research on information society and its evolution. Some of them, worked out in this paper, deal with the role of social variety in the process of post‐industrial evolution. Exploring similarities in bio‐genetic information, the process of social transformation is approached by using social system theory.

With certain analogies to biological transformations—mutations—important elements for the transformation of information‐guided behaviour systems (cultures) may be observed. They create a variety of elements (sub‐systems), which respond for changes in the social layout of all kinds of organisations like states, partys, groups, insofar as these changes aim the optimation of functional effectivity in dependence of the variety and its use by a social system's elements (events, acts).

By information processing, collectivities are able to explote even subtile fluctuations in socio‐cultural information variety to “cause” changes. Collectivities are able to instruct and functionalise emerging information through feedback in such a way, that they get better chances to reach certain local values of selection. They are fitter in the sense of better instructed. This process is self‐organised, based on the principle of selection, so that the system chooses out of a complex landscape of values trough communication of measuring parameters like “good” and “bad”. The value‐system is learned through socialisation and changed by social experience.

If social change and variety are optimised, the replication of the system works close to a “treshold of error”, that means that transformation processes are driven to a dynamic equilibrium between stabiliy and creativity. A variety of new transformation operators emerges. Operators of the former dominant information code are still reproducted, but a lot of other alternatives, stabilised by mutual separation are also represented in a survivable concentration and quantity. The competition between these new operators can be transformed in cooperation by their cyclic boundage in networks.

Concluding the paper argues that social systems which intend an optimation of their power management functions by integration of information variety, take advantage in their development in comparison to those who neglect this aspect. They are prepared to develop in a changing environment. Their optimation is a result of feedback within a variety of leadership‐systems, which may also be seen as competitive lifestyles. At a certain critic point there occurs a break in the symmetry of the dominant organisation: a multipole political leadership system emerges, behaviours are derepressed and activated. Uniformity in social time is broken and with it the linear thinking.