Welfare Rights and Conflicts of Rights |
| |
Authors: | Katherine Eddy |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Centre for the Study of Social Justice, Department of Politics & International Relations, University of Oxford, Manor Road Building, Manor Road, Oxford, OX1 3UQ, UK |
| |
Abstract: | The fact that welfare rights – rights to food, shelter and medical care – will conflict with one another is often taken to be good reason to exclude welfare rights from the catalogue of genuine rights. Rather than respond to this objection by pointing out that all rights conflict, welfare rights proponents need to take the conflicts objection seriously. The existence of potentially conflicting and more weighty normative considerations counts against a claim’s status as a genuine right. To think otherwise would be to threaten the peremptory force – and hence the analytical integrity – of rights. The conflicts objection is made more pressing once we have conceded that welfare rights give people entitlements to what are potentially scarce goods. I argue that welfare rights can survive the conflicts objection if, and only if, we take scarcity into account in the framing of a given welfare right. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Nuffield Political Theory Workshop in Oxford and the Canadian Philosophical Association Congress 2006 at York University. I am grateful to Adam Swift, David Miller, Idil Boran, Sarah McCallum and two anonymous referees for their comments, and to the Economic and Social Research Council for research funding. |
| |
Keywords: | constitutional rights human rights resource allocation social rights scarcity |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|