On the emergence of the discriminative mode for transitive-inference

Transitive-inference tasks play increasing roles in many areas of cognitive science. However, discrepancies between the two competing paradigms (classical-Piagetian and IP-paradigm) imply that one paradigm fails to index its target (deductive) competence. Here, potential flaws of one were addressed using considerations from the other. Children of 5–7 years (N=216) solved 3-term transitive problems, some implying a single largest item, and some not. Findings indicate a discriminative competence (a Transitive-Switch) at least 2 years before competence in actually deducing correct solutions. Interestingly, although the transitive-switch was constant across age with both memory and inference increasing with age, it was nevertheless a much stronger predictor of transitive performance than either memory or age. A predictive relationship between memory and inference held for the 5- and 6-year-olds but not the 7-year-olds; suggesting as it approaches maturity, transitive-inference becomes independent of memory. Coincidental with this latter finding, only the 7-year-olds’ transitive performance approximated a deductive competence. As the initial validation of the IP-paradigm rested on acceptance of its age estimate of 4 years, its claim to index deduction must now be revisited.