The psychosocial aspects of a return to sport following serious injury: A review of the literature from a self-determination perspective |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Human Movement Studies, Charles Sturt University, Panorama Avenue, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia;2. Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, Florida State University, 307 Stone Building, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA;1. Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, UK;2. School of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St. Mary''s University, UK;1. Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;2. Aspetar Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar;3. School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia;4. Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden;5. Orthopaedic Department, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;1. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Australia;2. School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Australia;3. Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Queensland, Australia;4. Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, Australia;1. Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Box 5605, SE 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden;2. Centre of research on Welfare, Health and Sport, HOS, Halmstad University, Box 823, SE 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden;1. School of Education, The Academic College at Wingate, Israel;2. Psychology Department, University of Southern Indiana, USA;3. School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, UK;4. College of Education, Florida State University, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectivesThe objective of this paper is to review the literature relevant to the psychosocial aspects of a return to sport following injury using a self-determination theoretical (SDT) framework.MethodsThe literature was reviewed qualitatively. SDT was used to interpret and bring coherence to the diverse array of findings.ResultsThe review is divided into four main sections. In section one, two conceptual models—the biopsychosocial model and the stages of return to sport model—that have been used to describe the return to sport following injury are examined and critiqued. In light of the limitations of these two models, SDT is presented as a potentially useful framework for synthesising the extant literature and making suggestions for future research on return to sport after injury phenomena (Section 2). Analysis of the psychosocial sport injury literature within a self-determination framework (Section 3) reveals the ways in which issues of competence, autonomy and relatedness may be salient during the return transition. In the fourth and final section, the implications of the findings are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided in line with self-determination theoretical contentions.ConclusionsSDT has potential for understanding findings in this area and for guiding future research. From an applied perspective, ensuring athletes’ needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness are met, may yield beneficial return-to-sport outcomes. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
