Peer review: Selecting the best science |
| |
Authors: | Wendy Baldwin Belinda Seto Ph.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) National Institutes of Health, 1 Center Drive, MSC 0162 Bldg. 1, Room 252, 20892-0152 Bethesda, MD, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The major challenge facing today’s biomedical researchers is the increasing competition for available funds. The competitive review process, through which the National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards grants, is built upon review by a committee of expert scientists. The NIH is firmly committed to ensuring that its peer review system is fair and objective. Wendy Baldwin, Ph.D., is Deputy Director for Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health. This paper is based on a presentation at a workshop, “Advances in Peer Review Research”, American Association for the Advancement of Science Meeting, Baltimore, MD, February 9, 1996. |
| |
Keywords: | peer review conflicts of interest confidentiality funding decisions |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|