首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Peer review: Selecting the best science
Authors:Wendy Baldwin  Belinda Seto Ph.D.
Affiliation:(1) National Institutes of Health, 1 Center Drive, MSC 0162 Bldg. 1, Room 252, 20892-0152 Bethesda, MD, USA
Abstract:The major challenge facing today’s biomedical researchers is the increasing competition for available funds. The competitive review process, through which the National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards grants, is built upon review by a committee of expert scientists. The NIH is firmly committed to ensuring that its peer review system is fair and objective. Wendy Baldwin, Ph.D., is Deputy Director for Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health. This paper is based on a presentation at a workshop, “Advances in Peer Review Research”, American Association for the Advancement of Science Meeting, Baltimore, MD, February 9, 1996.
Keywords:peer review  conflicts of interest  confidentiality  funding decisions
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号