Driving simulator validation with hazard perception |
| |
Authors: | Geoffrey Underwood David Crundall Peter Chapman |
| |
Affiliation: | School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK |
| |
Abstract: | How should we assess the comparability of driving on a road and “driving” in a simulator? If similar patterns of behaviour are observed, with similar differences between individuals, then we can conclude that driving in the simulator will deliver representative results and the advantages of simulators (controlled environments, hazardous situations) can be appreciated. To evaluate a driving simulator here we compare hazard detection while driving on roads, while watching short film clips recorded from a vehicle moving through traffic, and while driving through a simulated city in a fully instrumented fixed-base simulator with a 90 degree forward view (plus mirrors) that is under the speed/direction control of the driver. In all three situations we find increased scanning by more experienced and especially professional drivers, and earlier eye fixations on hazardous objects for experienced drivers. This comparability encourages the use of simulators in drivers training and testing. |
| |
Keywords: | Driving simulator Situation awareness Hazard perception Visual search Eye movements |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|