Mental and perceptual feedback in the development of creative flow |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom;2. Department of Psychology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom;1. Human Development and Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA;2. War Child Holland-Lebanon, Tripoli, Lebanon;3. War Child Holland-Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon;4. War Child Holland, 1098 LE Amsterdam, Netherlands;1. Cyprus Interaction Lab, Department of Multimedia and Graphic Arts, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Archbishop Kyprianou Str. 3036, Limassol, Cyprus;2. School of Computer Sciences & Informatics, Cardiff University, 5 The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, Wales, UK;1. University of Nottingham Malaysia, Malaysia;2. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore;3. University of Tasmania, Australia;1. Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan;2. Center for Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Leuven, Belgium, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | Sketching is considered by artists and designers to be a vital tool in the creative process. However, research shows that externalisation during the creative process (i.e., sketching) is not necessary to create effectively. This study examines whether sketching may play a more important role in the subjective experience of creativity by facilitating the deeply focused, optimal state of consciousness termed ‘flow’ (being ‘in the zone’). The study additionally explored whether sketching affects flow by easing cognitive load or by providing a clearer sense of self-feedback. Participants carried out the creative mental synthesis task (combining sets of simple shapes into creative drawings), experimentally simulating the visual creative process. Ideas were generated either mentally before committing to a final drawing, or with external perceptual support through sketching, and cognitive load was varied by using either three- or five-shape sets. The sketching condition resulted in greater experience of flow and lower perceived task difficulty. However, cognitive load did not affect flow and there was no interaction between load and sketching conditions. These findings are the first to empirically demonstrate that sketching increases flow experience, and that this is not dependent on an associated reduction in overall working memory load. |
| |
Keywords: | Flow Visual creativity Externalisation Mental synthesis Working memory |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|