首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Psychologists' perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO‐IUPsyS Global Survey
Authors:Spencer C. Evans  Geoffrey M. Reed  Michael C. Roberts  Patricia Esparza  Ann D. Watts  João Mendonça Correia  Pierre Ritchie  Mario Maj  Shekhar Saxena
Affiliation:1. Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, , Lawrence, KS, USA;2. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, , Geneva, Switzerland;3. Department of Psychology and Counseling, Webster University, , Geneva, Switzerland;4. International Union of Psychological Science;5. Entabeni Hospital, , Durban, South Africa;6. Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, , Maastricht, The Netherlands;7. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, , Ottawa, Canada;8. World Psychiatric Association;9. Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, , Naples, Italy
Abstract:This study examined psychologists' views and practices regarding diagnostic classification systems for mental and behavioral disorders so as to inform the development of the ICD‐11 by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO and the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) conducted a multilingual survey of 2155 psychologists from 23 countries, recruited through their national psychological associations. Sixty percent of global psychologists routinely used a formal classification system, with ICD‐10 used most frequently by 51% and DSM‐IV by 44%. Psychologists viewed informing treatment decisions and facilitating communication as the most important purposes of classification, and preferred flexible diagnostic guidelines to strict criteria. Clinicians favorably evaluated most diagnostic categories, but identified a number of problematic diagnoses. Substantial percentages reported problems with crosscultural applicability and cultural bias, especially among psychologists outside the USA and Europe. Findings underscore the priority of clinical utility and professional and cultural differences in international psychology. Implications for ICD‐11 development and dissemination are discussed.
Keywords:international classification of diseases (ICD)  diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM)  diagnostic classification system  clinical utility  psychologists
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号