| Abstract: | From his earliest published writing Webster identified the moral life as the horizon of dogmatic enquiry, and his last‐published work offers a subtle clarification of how dogmatics relates to ethics. The principle ‘action follows being’ governs both the relation of the two sub‐disciplines and the internal logic of each. As theology is a knowledge acquired not only speculatively but also practically, dogmatics must look forward and practical theology look back. Their interaction covers the whole range of theological topics. It is a fittingly Chalcedonian conception stressing the duality of dogmatics and ethics alongside their unity. While specialized dogmatics and ethics are legitimate, the two remain proximate, in a definite order of origin and derivation. The temptation of a de‐moralized theology equalled by that of a theology wrongly constructed on a moral a priori. In his late essays Webster presents worked examples of how dogmatics may handle moral questions without venturing into casuistic exploration of dilemmas. One essay, however, goes further, troublingly describing ‘mortification and vivification’ as the primary human acts of the regenerate state, a function that the tradition has always assigned to love. |
