Taking Law Seriously: Starting Points of the Hart/Devlin Debate* |
| |
Authors: | Peter Cane |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Law and Philosophy Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | The famous mid-20th century debate between Patrick Devlin and Herbert Hart about the relationship between law and morality addressed the limits of the criminal law in the context of a proposal by the Wolfenden Committee to decriminalize male homosexual activity in private. The original exchanges and subsequent contributions to the debate have been significantly constrained by the terms in which the debate was framed: a focus on criminal law in general and sexual offences in particular; a preoccupation with the so-called “harm principle,” a sharp delineation of the realms of law and morality, and a static conception of the relationship between them. This article explores the limitations imposed by these various starting-points and argues for a holistic and symbiotic understanding of the relationship between law and morality. * Thanks to Tony Connolly, Leighton McDonald and Niki Lacey for penetrating and suggestive comments on previous versions. |
| |
Keywords: | Joel Feinberg H. L. A. Hart harm principle Hart– Devlin debate law and morality legal enforcement of morality legal moralism limits of the criminal law Lord Devlin J. S. Mill paternalism sexual offences Wolfenden Committee |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|