KIRKPATRICK'S LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA: THIRTY YEARS LATER |
| |
Authors: | GEORGE M ALLIGER ELIZABETH A JANAK |
| |
Institution: | The University at Albany, State University of New York |
| |
Abstract: | Kirkpatrick's model (1959a, 1959b, 1960a, 1960b) of training evaluation criteria has had widespread and enduring popularity. This model proposed four "levels" of training evaluation criteria: reactions, learning, behavior, and results. Three problematic assumptions of the model may be identified: (1) The levels are arranged in ascending order of information provided. (2) The levels are causally linked. (3) The levels are positively intercorrelated. This article examines the validity of these assumptions, the frequency of each level in published evaluation studies, correlations from the literature in regard to Assumptions 2 and 3, and implications for the researcher and training manager. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|