Conceptual overlap between moral norms and anticipated regret in the prediction of intention: Implications for theory of planned behaviour research |
| |
Authors: | Joshua D. Newton Fiona J. Newton Michael T. Ewing Sue Burney Margaret Hay |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Marketing , Monash University , Frankston , Australia joshua.newton@monash.edu;3. Department of Marketing , Monash University , Frankston , Australia;4. Cabrini Monash Psycho-oncology, Cabrini Health , Malvern , Australia;5. School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University , Clayton , Australia;6. Health Professions Education and Educational Research (Health PEER), Monash University , Clayton , Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Moral norms and anticipated regret are widely used extensions to the theory of planned behaviour, yet there is some evidence to suggest that these constructs may conceptually overlap as predictors of intention. Two health-related behaviours with distinct moral implications (Study 1: organ donation registration, N?=?352 and Study 2: condom usage, N?=?1815) were therefore examined to ascertain whether moral norms and anticipated regret are indeed conceptually distinct. While evidence consistent with conceptual overlap was identified in Study 1, the evidence for such overlap in Study 2 was more ambiguous. In Study 3, a meta-analysis of existing literature revealed that the relationship between moral norms and anticipated regret was moderated by the extent of the moral implications arising from the behaviour under examination. Taken together, these findings suggest that conceptual overlap between moral norms and anticipated regret is more likely to occur among behaviours with obvious moral implications. Researchers wishing to examine the predictive utility of moral norms and anticipated regret among such behaviours would therefore be advised to aggregate these measures to form a composite variable (personal norms). |
| |
Keywords: | theory of planned behaviour moral norms anticipated regret intention |
|
|