An analysis of programming DRL schedules in educational settings |
| |
Authors: | Samuel M. Deitz |
| |
Affiliation: | Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30303, U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | Three methods for programming the differential reinforcement of low rate were explained, labeled, illustrated by research studies, and analyzed, but not compared. Spaced Responding DRL, the first and most common method in laboratory studies, was illustrated through the reduction of the inappropriate questioning by three behaviorally disturbed children. Full Session DRL, the most common method in applied studies, was illustrated through the reduction of talk-outs by an EMR male. Interval DRL, not previously presented in either applied or laboratory literature, was illustrated through the reduction of talk-outs by a 6-yr-old first grade girl. All methods proved effective, and an analysis of their differences and similarities was discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | Reprints may be obtained from the first author Educational Foundations Department Georgia State Unviversity Atlanta GA 30303 USA |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|