"结构":解读古典经济学哲学构架的逻辑中轴--瓦尔特·本雅明:作品、生活、时代和历史的交叠

马克思的"古典经济学"概念具有明确内涵、外延并与一定的"知识型"相关,这与西方学者在一般的、含糊的意义使用这个概念具有根本的异质性.它界划了一种分析的范式,说明了马克思与资产阶级经济学之间存在着"知识型"的断裂,这种分析范式就是从配第和布阿吉尔贝尔开始的探讨社会结构及由这种结构所决定的运动规律,这是"古典经济学"概念之独特内涵所在.福柯等人忽视了古典经济学的"结构"视角而从"劳动"范畴出发,认为马克思对李嘉图的修正在西方知识的最深层中并未产生真正的间断性,这是没有读懂马克思"古典政治经济学"的真正内涵.

Structure: the logic essence to understand the philosophical framework of classical economy

Marxian concept of " classical economy", which is radically heterogeneous to the concept used by the western scholars in a general and ambiguous sense, has a definite connotation and extension and is related to a certain "episteme". It has demarcated an analytical paradigm, which is an investigation - started by William Petty and Boisguil lebert - of the social structure and the law of movement determined by this kind of structure and in which the characteristic connotation of "classical economy" lies, and expounded that there exists a rupture of "episteme" between economics of bourgeoisie and that of Marx. Some scholars such as Michel Foucault neglected the "structural" perspective of classical economy and departed from the category "labor" and therefore thought that Marxian revision of David Ricardo had not resulted to real discontinuity in the deepest layer of western knowledge. This is due to genuine misunderstanding of the authentic connotation of Marxian "classical political economy".