Terminating Without Fatality |
| |
Authors: | Heather Craige M.S.W. |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. UNC-Duke Psychoanalytic Institute;2. North Carolina Psychoanalytic Foundation;3. Lucy Daniels Foundation |
| |
Abstract: | The psychoanalytic relationship is unique among intimate relationships, in that its ultimate goal is separation. After termination, the analysand mourns the loss of the analyst and while feeling vulnerable and bereft, faces demanding emotional tasks alone. The post-termination phase is a precarious time during which the hard-won gains of an analysis may be threatened or even lost. Given the analysand's vulnerability, it is disturbing that many of our common termination practices may undermine the patient's leave-taking and harm the positive internal images of the analyst and the analytic relationship that have been forged during the analysis. Findings from recent research about the patient's experience after analysis are presented and implications are drawn for practice regarding the termination and post-termination phases. The author recommends that our theory and technique of termination should be reexamined and revised in light of new research and within the context of contemporary two-person theories of psychoanalysis. In real life, only death and hostility bring a libidinal relationship to an end. The kind of termination psychoanalysis demands is without precedent. —Martin Bergmann (1997, p. 163) |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|